Stroke  - Miami Medical Malpractice Lawyer: Sean M. Cleary

If you have experienced a stroke following misdiagnosis or improper medical treatment, you and your family deserve to be compensated; call for a free case evaluation.

How Can We Help in a Stroke Malpractice Case?

Our documentation and the experience we had with clients that suffered strokes, will help us speed up the legal process and obtain maximum compensation for you and your family.

Sean M. Cleary

What our clients say about their cases

Read all reviews

Stroke After Emergency Room Visit

My husband was sent home without receiving the proper care at the emergency room. Sean understood our situation and helped us with the case.

Jill Z.

Star Star Star Star Star
Video Testimonial

Stroke Medical Malpractice

The doctors put the wrong diagnose and sent me home. Sean is a very experienced lawyer that handled my medical malpractice case with patience.

David Z.

Star Star Star Star Star
Video Testimonial

Michael B.- Google Review

I couldn't be happier with the legal representation and work Sean gave to the organization I represent. He was a thoughtful, professional partner in an extremely difficult situation that at times seemed hopeless but reached a successful end with all parties agreeable with the outcome. A very difficult navigation that Sean was able to help lead us through. We are thankful for his help, and I highly recommend Sean when looking for legal services.

Michael B.

Google Review

Robert L. - Google Review

My wife and I were referred to Sean Cleary by another Attorney. He was very highly recommended and, I must say, very deservedly so. Sean is very diligent in his work; his preparation is phenomenal and his presentations are something to behold. He is very accessible if you have any questions. He always takes the time to fully explain in language you can understand. We highly recommend anyone needing to Sean Cleary.

Robert L.

Google Review

Mary O. - Google Review

Sean Cleary represented my husband and I in a very difficult medical malpractice case. Mr. Cleary was always was courteous, diligent and professional. He was straightforward and upfront about the challenges we faced but never relented in his pursuit of justice on our behalf, up through and beyond a contentious 6-day jury trial. We would recommend him without hesitation.

Mary O.

Google Review

Leopoldo G. - Google Review

Sean is an outstanding professional, transparent and very diligent; he personally dedicated time and attention to my case; he always responded my calls promptly, keeping me informed all the time. His knowledge and advises are very accurate and valuable. Definitely, great lawyer.

Leopoldo G.

Google Review

Julie F. - Google Review

I would highly recommend Sean Cleary. Not only is he a very knowledgeable attorney he takes the time to explain the law to ensure you understand every aspect of your case. He is also very sensitive to the needs of you and or your family during very trying times.

Julie F.

Google Review

Sandra P. - Google Review

From day one, Mr. Cleary had faith in my case. He paid attention to every detail with great professionalism. He did not shy away from any challenges and went the extra mile to provide what he promised.

Sandra P.

Google Review

Digna F. - Google Review

Highly recommended. Sean is smart, conscientious, detail-oriented and extremely knowledgeable in his field. Always gets excellent results for his clients.

Digna F.

Google Review

Dino S. - Google Review

If you have a problem or have been wronged, Sean Cleary is the man to talk to. Had a fantastic experience with Sean and all of the friendly, helpful and professional staff of the firm. If Sean accepts you as a client and agrees to represent you, you'll be in the best of hands.

Dino S.

Google Review

Medical Malpractice Trial

Sean represented my husband and I in a medical malpractice case. It was a very difficult time for us. Therefore it was great that he always was courteous, diligent and highly professional. Sean is always straightforward and upfront about the challenges you are to face. We highly recommend him.

Mary O.

Client Testimonial

Nicolas E. - Google Review

Sean represented my wife and I and our three-year-old daughter in a case involving medical malpractice after she was born at a Miami hospital. The case was settled confidentially, providing for the future care and treatment of our daughter, and we were very satisfied with the result.

Nicolas E.

Google Review

Stroke Patient Delayed Treatment

Clients were satisfied by Mr. Cleary's legal services.


Client Testimonial
Stroke Malpractice Lawyer

In the United States, stroke affects over 700K people each year, about 500K of which are first-time strokes, while the remaining 200K are recurrent stroke attacks. Stroke is the leading cause of disability among American adults and kills someone in Florida every 3.3 seconds. Over 4 million Americans have survived a stroke and are living with the effects. About 14% of them will have another one within a year, and 25% will have another episode within five years. Strokes can and do occur at any age and they are the third leading cause of death in the U.S. behind heart disease and cancer. Death and disability can be reduced by 30% if the signs of stroke are immediately recognized and treated.


One afternoon while on his lunch break, a young man began suffering an onslaught of disturbing symptoms. He was unable to speak clearly, had difficulty walking and had a major headache, all classic symptoms of a stroke. He was taken by ambulance to a local hospital in Miami. The treating physicians diagnosed him with food poisoning as he had been eating a piece of chocolate cake when the symptoms presented themselves. Although he was still unable to walk or talk coherently, hospital doctors discharged him and sent him home. With the stroke undiagnosed and untreated, the patient sustained permanent brain damage. He has been unable to return to work due to cognitive impairment, the inability to multi-task and memory loss.

The victim, 60-year-old Navy veteran, sought help from the VA after experiencing partial blindness and headaches. A physician ordered the patient to be transferred to a facility capable of higher-level stroke care after testing confirmed a stroke had likely occurred, but the doctor canceled the move amid confusion about the best course of action. The physician never consulted a cardiologist or neurologist, both of which were available at the clinic. Instead, he discharged the patient and instructed him to take two baby aspirin a day, in addition to arranging for staff to call him and schedule a cardiology appointment. The patient showed up at the clinic a month later for a routine visit. His primary-care physician was never aware that he had previously suffered a stroke, according to the doctor’s deposition. One day later, he was found unresponsive in his home after a second stroke. He suffered a massive stroke that left him with “locked-in syndrome,” meaning he remains fully conscious and able to feel pain but controls only minor movements of his eyes and head.

A healthy young woman complained of severe headaches, and a friend speeded her to hospital. Numbness, garbled speech and dizziness soon added to the pain. Then, two days later, the patient suffered a massive stroke that destroyed the critical tissue of her upper spinal cord and lower brain stem, leaving her paralyzed from the neck down. The doctor who first looked after her misdiagnosed the tell-tale symptoms, delayed the treatment she desperately needed and took steps which actually hastened that brain attack.

A woman went to the hospital after suffering from a severe and persistent headache. The woman was given a CT scan after she began showing some neurological effects and slurred speech. The radiologist who (mis)interpreted the CT scan concluded that there was no evidence of acute hemorrhage, mass lesion, mass effect, acute ischemia, or extra-axial fluid collections. The radiologist also noted that there appeared to be some abnormalities in the scan, but determined that they were of doubtful clinical significance. The woman’s condition then worsened, and she was flown to a larger hospital, where she was given another CT scan. This time, the scan was read correctly, and it confirmed that the woman had, in fact, suffered a stroke. Unfortunately, due to the delay in diagnosis, the window to treat her had already closed. The woman eventually had brain surgery and survived, but she suffered severe brain damage that requires her to undergo intensive therapies and rehabilitation to relearn how to perform daily activities.

The patient, aged 87, was admitted to a hospital in Miami because he started showing signs of confusion. When being admitted, he was in a relatively good state. He was not diagnosed with any serious, life-threatening illness. However, on the fifth day of his admission while receiving combinations of anticoagulant medication he suddenly died. He had a sudden brain hemorrhage within 15-20 hours after receiving an increased dosage and passed away less than 12 hours after the hemorrhagic stroke. As an inpatient, he was first treated by a neurologist who never seemed to care for or follow up on this patient, and she just let an osteopathic physician care for his stroke. He was for several days under the improper care of the osteopathic physician and negligent nurses. He was receiving anticoagulant medication continuously at the wrong time.

The patient, aged 13, visited a neurologist for numbing sensations she was experiencing in her limbs. The neurologist informed the family that she had a rare form of migraine that caused numbing sensations instead of headaches and prescribed the drug Zomig. Sure of his diagnosis, he refused to order an MRI. A few days later, the patient suffered a massive stroke, as a direct result of the Zomig. After the stroke, she was diagnosed with MoyaMoya, a disease which causes occlusion of the carotid arteries. The numbing sensations she was experiencing were not migraines, but mini-strokes. Zomig, caused constriction of the arteries, turning her mini-strokes into one catastrophic one. The stroke left her with massive damage to her brain and major deficits.

This medical malpractice case involves a delay in the diagnosis of carotid stenosis, resulting in a stroke. The patient was on a business trip when he experienced an acute onset of lightheadedness, vertigo, and nausea. The patient also experienced numbness and tingling in his left arm for approximately one minute. He called 911, and he was taken to the ER via ambulance. He was seen in the ER by a doctor who ordered testing, including a brain CT scan. The patient was discharged with the diagnosis of benign transient labyrinthitis versus transient ischemic attack (TIA). He was told to have close follow up with his primary care physician when he returned home. As instructed, the patient telephoned the office of his family practice physician and explained to the receptionist what occurred in the ER, including that there was a question of a TIA. The employee of the office scheduled an appointment four days later. Two days later, the patient’s wife noted a left facial droop and left-sided weakness. The patient was sent urgently to the hospital where he was diagnosed with a right MCA stroke. Testing showed infarction of his brain. By the time of discharge, the patient required a straight cane to walk and was subsequently noted to have a chronic pain syndrome as a result of his stroke.

The patient, a 58-year-old African American man with a past medical history that included obesity, smoking, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and atherosclerotic vascular disease presented to the doctor's office with complaints of lightheadedness and nausea. Without any testing, the doctor diagnosed him with an otitis media (middle ear infection) and prescribed medication. The patient returned to the office after having completed the previously prescribed course of antibiotic therapy. On this date, he informed the doctor that he continued to experience lightheadedness and nausea and was now also experiencing double vision as well. The doctor ordered no testing on this date but rather sent him to see an ENT physician. He was evaluated two weeks later by the ENT who was unable to come to a definitive cause for the dizziness and double vision. Over the next several weeks, the patient continued to suffer from double vision and dizziness. One morning he phoned the doctor’s office to report severe lightheadedness and double vision. Instead of sending him to an emergency room, the doctor scheduled an appointment for that afternoon. The patient left his home later that morning and was heading to the office, but he never arrived. He was found unresponsive in his car at the side of the road. On arrival to an emergency department, the patient was noted to be unresponsive to all but painful stimuli. A CT scan was performed and showed an old, small, prefrontal lacunar infarct. Today, the patient resides in a nursing home, is a quadriplegic and is only able to communicate by blinking his eyes in response to questions.

The patient sought care from the primary care physician regarding ongoing dizziness and underwent tests which showed abnormalities in her brain. This information was communicated to the doctor on more than one occasion, but she never discussed the clinical significance of these findings with her patient. A year later, the patient sought ongoing care from her primary care physician regarding her ongoing dizziness, but also in order to facilitate a referral for repeat MRI and CTA. Once again, the imaging studies revealed a large venous varix and an aneurysm. This information was communicated to the doctor. Two years later the patient became pregnant. She received her prenatal care through an OB/GYN group. According to the records, the OB/GYN care providers checked for problems but were not alerted as to the presence of the brain abnormalities. Consequently, she was allowed to labor and deliver her daughter vaginally. The physical stress of the second stage of labor caused a clot to form. As a result, the patient suffered a severe hemorrhagic stroke and lost function in all of her extremities except for her right arm. Following the birth of her daughter, the patient spent a total of 18 months in hospitals and rehabilitation programs.

The patient presented to his primary care physician with complaints of left-hand numbness, decreased grip strength, increased blood pressure, and a family history of coronary artery disease. The doctor’s impression was that the symptoms were due to trauma or a neurologic etiology, and he referred him to a hand surgeon for further evaluation. After a negative exam, he was referred to a neurologist who performed non-diagnostic tests. Despite his symptoms, the doctor did not order any further work-up or testing. Instead, he recommended follow-up in three months. He did not communicate with the primary care physician about test results. Twenty days later, the patient suffered an acute cerebral vascular accident. Upon arrival to the ER with slurred speech and leg weakness, deficits worsened, and he was transferred to a tertiary care center where he received medication for an embolic stroke secondary. He was discharged to a rehabilitation facility, where he remained for a month. He currently suffers significant, lasting neurological impairment.

One of the biggest payouts for a medical malpractice suit centered around a stroke victim. In a case that resulted in a $217 million verdict, a patient went into a Pennsylvania hospital ED with confusion, dizziness, headache, nausea, and double vision. He had elevated cholesterol, hypertension, diabetes, and a family history of stroke. A mid-level provider tended to him and ordered blood tests and two CT scans and read both as being negative for stroke. The patient received a diagnosis of headache and sinusitis, approved by the ED physician, and was sent home. The physician just went along with the mid-level diagnosis and did not stop to examine the patient personally, consider his medical and family history or conduct a neurological assessment.

The next morning, as his symptoms had gotten worse, the man returned to the ED. The stroke was confirmed, but his treatment fell short of what was required. The man spent three months in a coma and another six months in care facilities.

In the end, the patient suffered a permanent paraplegic state, sustaining mental disabilities as well as paralysis. In the lawsuit that followed, it was asserted that the patient should have been treated by the original ED physician for his stroke symptoms as soon as he came in. Later, the patient’s attorney discovered that the mid-level provider did not have a license and had failed the licensing Physician Assistant test four times.


What We Do in a Stroke Malpractice Case

Our Legal Process

Common Stroke Questions

Who Do I Sue in a Stroke Medical Malpractice Case? »

In a stroke malpractice case, the hospital is rarely liable, as doctors are usually independent practitioners. Medical malpractice claims should be made against the attending doctor or other attending medical staff, by showing that the defendant’s actions caused injury to the patient.

View full answer
What Information Do I Need for a Successful Stroke Medical Malpractice Lawsuit in Miami? »

In all medical malpractice cases, you need to first show the existence of a doctor-patient relationship; demonstrate that the doctor failed to provide a reasonable standard level of care through negligence; and show causation between that negligence and your injury.

View full answer
Are There Any Damage Caps On Stroke Medical Malpractice Cases? »

Damages for expenses incurred, as well as pain and suffering, are capped in several states. However, some caps were overturned in court. Contact a specialized attorney to find out what to expect.

View full answer
What Is the Statute of Limitations for Making and Solving My Florida Stroke Medical Malpractice Claim? »

In Florida, the statute of limitations for filing a stroke medical malpractice claim is 2 years from when the patient either knew or should have known that the injury exists and there is a plausible probability that it was caused by medical malpractice. Simple and clear-cut cases take up to 6 months to conclude, while complex ones can take up to 5 years for damages to be paid.

View full answer
How Can a Stroke Medical Malpractice Case Be Defined? »

Stroke medical malpractice occurs when the stroke was caused directly by the doctor’s action or inaction, through negligence (such as surgical error leading to stroke), or when the doctor has failed to provide the proper level of care (e.g. not providing appropriate medication in high-risk patients).

View full answer
More Questions

For questions and free legal advice to help individuals please call us

Disclaimer: Please note that the information provided on this site is not formal legal advice, also the site does not allow you to form an attorney-client relationship.